Hard to dispute the consensus over AGW, yet here we are.
[FUTURIST] Having 98% of bigfoot researchers agree that bigfoot exists doesn’t make it so.
Objections and Replies
(Having 98% of scientists saying something does not make it so)
That empirical scientists can be wrong is par for the course. The alternative would be that science can’t ever be wrong. That’d be a bigger problem, if you ask me. So you’re not saying much.